|
Where a building owner, without written consent or a valid award (statutory authority) carries out (or is about to carry out) work they may trespass, cause nuisance or breach their statutory duty. In such cases, an adjoining owner may consider obtaining an injunction. In party wall matters, an injunction is usually obtained to prevent notifiable works continuing. It may also be obtained to require a building owner to carry out specific works e.g. install temporary shoring or weathering. As one of the aims of the Act is to mitigate risk of damage and other unnecessary inconvenience for adjoining owners, the fact that work is covered by the Act, implies there is such risk. Although this isn’t always the case, many (incorrectly) consider notifiable works are risky by default. If an injunction application is to be made, it should be at the earliest opportunity. Where action is taken slowly, Courts may be unconvinced by the adjoining owner’s concerns as delay would imply the risk associated with the work is insignificant. Is there a real risk?The failure to comply with the Act’s requirements to notify the adjoining owner of notifiable works, or failing obtain an award, can be frowned upon by the Court. Consequently, persuading a Court that the building owner is at fault and therefore to grant an injunction, should be straightforward. However, whilst an adjoining owner may be able to obtain an injunction simply because the building owner has not obtained statutory consent, it makes more sense to seek such an injunction only where there is a real risk of damage to their property. Otherwise, there seems to be little benefit in incurring the cost and time associated with an injunction application. Are the works notifiable?Adjoining owners should do what they can to be certain the work that concerns them is in fact, notifiable. This isn’t always as simple as it might sound.
If the building owner refuses to engage, it might be time to engage a solicitor to write a firm letter to them to request information or risk an injunction. This can be important as even where the works turn out not to be notifiable, the building owner may still be held liable for costs incurred due to their failure to engage properly at an early stage. How to apply for an injunctionCourts will allow you to make an application yourself. A suitably qualified and experienced lawyer should make the process of applying for and obtaining an injunction far smoother and less stressful, but that will come at a cost. There is standard form N16A to complete. Ideally, the form should be accompanied by a (simple) witness statement. This can be prepared by the adjoining owner but may be better received if from a party wall surveyor. A witness statement should include:
The Court will usually require you to give what is known as a “cross-undertaking”. This is a promise that if, at the end of the case, the Court decides that an injunction should not have been given, the you will pay whatever damages (to your neighbour) the Court deems appropriate. This can include the costs associated with the stopping of/delay to the building work. Where the matter is genuinely urgent (where there is a real risk of immediate damage) it can be possible to obtain a hearing before a judge within a few hours. Where you can convince the judge of the urgency of your case, they may be prepared to grant an injunction on the basis of an oral evidence. The person giving that evidence will be asked to give their undertaking to the Court that they will write and sign a witness statement to the same effect as soon as possible after the hearing. How much does it cost?If you make an application yourself, it may be possible to obtain an injunction for the Court costs of issuing such an application. If a surveyor is used to produce a witness statement, that might add to your costs but makes good sense as such advice could steer you away from an injunction application that may otherwise be incorrectly made and incur costs. Once lawyers become involved costs are likely to increase substantially. These could range from as little as £1,000 up to an eye watering £15,000. If the Court grants an injunction and agrees that you were justified in seeking it, the building owner will normally be liable to pay your costs. But beware, this does not mean the Court will grant all of your costs. Usually this means that the building owner will have to pay somewhere between 60-75% of your legal costs (lawyers fees). ConclusionWhilst injunctions can be useful for adjoining owners to ensure that building owners comply with their obligations under the Act, consideration must be given the circumstances:
Our advice: proceed with caution as the risk can quickly outweigh the benefits. If in doubt, seek expert legal advice. Disclaimer:The information provided in this document is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, it is not tailored to your specific situation. Always consult with a qualified professional before taking any action related to the issues discussed. The authors are not liable for any actions taken based on this content, and no legal relationship is formed by reading or interpreting this material.
Need help with a Party Wall Act issue? Contact Coburns Party Wall for expert advice and assistance.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
|
Twickenham Office
Ash House 8 Second Cross Road Twickenham TW2 5RF Walthamstow Office
195-197 Wood Street London E17 3NU |
Birmingham Office
Studio 9 50-54 St Paul’s Square Birmingham B3 1QS Harrow Office
79 College Road Harrow HA1 1BD |